OPEN LETTER to the Met regarding internationally protective paedophiles – at the cost of a Lithuanian boy

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the Nation...

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the National Revival of Poland (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Dear Sir Bernard

As the Association of McKenzie Friends we are ‘public interest advocates’ and follow white collar crimes associated with organised child sexual abuse and child snatching closely, as we are getting more and more requests for help.

Hence we alerted you about a crime in HMP Holloway which resulted in a US mother being deported whilst her child was kept for adoption.

This is to report a crime against a Lithuanian boy who was forcefully removed from his mother and grandmother, after they escaped his father’s persecutions in Lithuania – despite a judgement in the mother’s favour of the Supreme Court. Fortunately, the mother recorded the removal on video.

Unfortunately, however, Brent Social Services and HHJ Million operate in the father’s interests rather than those of the boy who needs to be protected from his ‘red banana’, as he calls it which we attach and publish on Continue reading

CHILD ABUSE debated in Parliament and reported on What Do They Know?

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the Nation...

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the National Revival of Poland (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Answers to oral questions are recorded under Debates on the remarkable What Do They Know website.

This one on 17 July 2014 was on Child Abuse – the hot topic in this hot summer:

United against Child Abuse was the start of the 10-day demo outside Downing Street is taking place again – reported by UK Column on Friday 18 July:

Whether for Freedom of Information Requests, commenting or learning about who knows what in Parliament, go clicking!

Meanwhile, just a few more links relevant to Continue reading

DO YOU WANT to stop child snatching and paedophile scandals? Everybody knows!

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the Nation...

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the National Revival of Poland (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Do you want to stop child snatching and paedophile scandals? This is the subject line of an email I sent to all MPs who have not yet expressed their support for the call to a National Enquiry into organised child sexual abuse.

The remarkable Tap publishes It’s not just Parliament that’s run and controlled by a paedophile ring. One of the items says: It’s gone international:

You are welcome to refer to this email, if you use to contact your own MP:

This is to ask when you will add your support to those 141 MPs so far who demand a National Enquiry into organised child sexual abuse.

Continue reading

MIND THE GAPS between what they Say, Write and Order: HHJ Simler, Treasury Solicitor & Private Barrister


Skype (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

First, Melissa Laird had a hearing scheduled for 05 December 2013.

But despite our efforts of trying to get her signature out of HMP Holloway, she got deported on 12 September 2013. And the hearing on 05 December 2013 was hijacked by the Treasury Solicitor to get the case ‘disposed’ of.

We, as her McKenzie Friends, argued that a Skype connection should be arranged so that she can represent herself.

Already on 27 January 2013, the President of the Family Division had appealed to courts to adapt to the realities of the internet, especially social media. But the Listings Office told me that Skype wasn’t ‘secure’. It had to be ISDN, which is totally outdated, as Melissa found out in the US. Tough luck for her, unfortunately.  Continue reading

BRACING for BATTLE in Court 2: McKenzie Friends assisted by Star McKenzie

Seven documents for four partiesLegal professionals are paid by the number of pages they produce and read.

We are ‘amateurs’, i.e. fuelled by love and passion, learning as we go along.

This learning exercise around the kidnap of Melissa Laird‘s son by Barnet Council and the dumping of the US mother on a wheelchair by the Home Office ends, for the moment, with a hearing tomorrow morning. We printed the seven documents in the photo – for ourselves, the judge and the other side.

Due to the busy diary of the private barrister employed by the Treasury Solicitor’s Office, the hearing has to take place at 9.30. It could not be adjourned, even though

  1. we were not present at the hearing when the cost order was made for £2,000 and £600;
  2. our Application Notice – prepared by a Star McKenzie Advisor and filed on 22 April – requests the transcript of the hearing in paragraph 15;
  3. I sent nine emails between 15 April and 02 June asking various parties for the transcript;
  4. Belinda did not get a letter telling her about this hearing on 04 June;
  5. I got four letters relating to three hearings.

Will let you know how things go! Meanwhile I shall talk to the angels in my dreams…

Enhanced by Zemanta

McKENZIE FRIENDS challenged in Court or the Forensics of a Legal Farce

Belinda McKenzie says she’s willing to go to prison to set a sign for the inappropriateness of us being financially penalised for doing pro bono work.

I am beginning to be amused when I read another McKenzie Friend writing about a farce by pink elephants! But when I emailed the Admin Court this morning, I was full of the ‘wrath of god’. It’s just too ridiculous to be taken seriously:

Dear Mr Chowdhury et al,

I have just received two letters dated 22 and 23 May respectively and I have two others of 19 May and 23 May. Altogether, they regard  three hearings:

  • on 23/05/2014 for 0 minutes       [the letter announcing this is dated 22 May!]
  • on 04/06/2014 for 45 minutes
  • on 25/06/2014 for 30 minutes.

As I am in temporary accommodation while health and safety works are being carried out in my flat, the redirection delays my mail. Despite that, I find it impossible to make sense of this way of wasting the court’s time.

Or is this a new method for the courts to make money out of McKenzie Friends – against the spirit of the report by the Legal Services Consumer Panel? Continue reading

POLICE DROP CHARGES against Portuguese Parents Fighting for the Return of their Children

Sabine Kurjo McNeill:

McKenzie Friends in Action in Grantham

Originally posted on The Pedro Family: five children snatched by Lincoln County Council - without paper work:

This is the video to accompany our news release:

Police Drop Charges against Portuguese Parents Fighting for the Return of their Children

This is the title of an article to be published[i] by the Algarve Resident. It encapsulates the day’s achievements and challenges in Grantham: two bail hearings of Jose and Carla Pedro were replaced by a “Released without Charge” form with a ticked box: “There is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.”

This admission by Lincoln Police is the result of a ‘Letter before Claim’ that the Pedros issued with the assistance of McKenzie Friends. However, the Police lawyer pointed out that the ‘children issue’ concerns Lincoln Council rather than the Police – even though they were the ones who removed the five children from their home and against their will on 23 April 2013.

Hence the Council’s response to the Letter…

View original 456 more words