FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST regarding care & contact procedures

14 04 15 UK Family Law ReformUK Family Law Reform is a very comprehensive website with a unique ‘megaphone’ to send emails to media, local authorities and MPs.

Here’s what I just sent to all local authorities:

This is to ask for the procedures that are in place:

1. to ensure that COURT ORDERS for CONTACT with children in care are being complied with;

2. to allow parents to enforce orders for contact when they are not being adhered to;

3. to ensure that embassies and consulates are being informed when non-UK children are taken into care;

4. to arrange for Consular visits of non-UK children in care.  Continue reading

Association of McKenzie Friends is looking for Barristers

Originally posted on Best Barristers... with a Heart for Victims of White Collar Crimes:

This video was recorded at our meeting on 6th September 2012. Steve had travelled from Lincolnshire  and I’m glad that the outcome is a Steering Group for the Association of Mckenzie Friends that Belinda McKenzie and I co-founded out of the needs of the moment.

The Association grew from ‘victims turned starfighters’ with reports about ‘cases and stories’ – as one-page summaries or on video – on

Our online remedy, so far, is the

View original

NEWS RELEASE: UK Violations of EU Law and Child RIGHTS: naming an Indian Child contrary to Article 10

NEWS RELEASE                                                                                                        04 April 2014

UK VIOLATIONS of EU LAW and CHILD RIGHTS

Naming an Indian Child without Family, Religious Ceremony
and without the Father on its Birth Certificate

VALUES and OBJECTIVES of the UNION[i]

The European Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, liberty, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values, which are set out in Article I-2, are common to the Member States. Moreover, the societies of the Member States are characterised by pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men. These values play an important role, especially in two specific cases:

Continue reading

PRESS RELEASE about the UK Delegation in Brussels to Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent

THANKS to the ‘megaphone’ of UK Family Law Reform (which can be used for local papers, too!):

UNIQUE FAMILY LAWS in the UK

Un-Believable Facts about Children in Foster ‘Care’ and Forced Adoptions

A UK delegation of parents is visiting the EU Petitions Committee on 19 March 2014, hoping to get their children returned, after they have been forcibly removed from them. Individual petitioners are a German parent, a Latvian mother and daughter, a Lithuanian and a British mother. Speaking on behalf of the thousands of parents effected will be German Sabine K McNeill who publishes petitions online and gathered the support of over 4,000 signatures. Other victims in support are an English greatgrandfather and father, a Welsh father as well as family and McKenzie Friends who have been assisting as lay legal advisors. The text submitted to the Committee in May 2013 is on http://mckenzie-friends.co.uk/petitions/abolish-adoption/ She will be followed by 3 petitioners from the Netherlands who copied the UK system of child ‘protection’[i]. Continue reading

ABOLISH ADOPTIONS without Parental Consent – to be presented in Brussels on 19 March


NEWS RELEASE                                                                                          14 February 2014

ABOLISH ADOPTIONS without PARENTAL CONSENT

Petitions of Latvian, Russian and Lithuanian Mothers and on behalf of thousands of victims in the UK before EU Committee
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/peti/home.html

A court hearing to protest the forced removal of children from their parents by a London Council has been timed to coincide with the presentation of a petition to the European Parliament to seek redress for similar actions by different councils for thousands of families nationwide. The petition has attracted over 2,500 signatures on http://www.change.org/petitions/eu-parliament-abolish-adoptions-without-parental-consent

A special meeting of the EU Petitions Committee will receive also a petition on 19 March from Latvian Laila Brice, whose five year old daughter was taken by Merton Council without a court order and put up for adoption.

On the same day Haringey Council will apply to the British Family court for the adoption of the two youngest of Gloria and Chiwar Musa[i] whose older five children were forcefully removed by police acting for the Council and the parents later jailed for supposedly having abused them.

The Association of McKenzie Friends, a voluntary organisation that supports both families, is campaigning to stop the forced removal of children from their parents and their subsequent fostering or adoption without due process.

The Association also decries the secrecy of family courts[ii], gagging orders with threat of imprisonment, and forced adoptions, which it says are unique in the UK[iii] Writing in The Telegraph, Christopher Booker described the situation as an international scandal[iv].

McKenzie Friends chair Belinda McKenzie believes the timing of the two events is not coincidental. “The courts will have known that we will be in Brussels to hand over the petition. What better time to schedule the Musa adoption hearing?” she said.

McKenzie Friends have documented and published many other cases where the children were forcibly removed from their parents under questionable circumstances.

“These are mostly immigrant families or vulnerable single mothers whom councils should be helping, not terrorising,” McKenzie said.

“The secrecy of the family courts was meant to protect children. Instead it is protecting shameful and unethical behaviour by the authorities.”

ends

For more details, please contact Sabine K McNeill on 07968 039 141 or sabine@3d-metrics.com

Notes and links for editors:

  1. The Association of McKenzie Friends[v] is an unfunded network of individuals. It has come together to help parents whose children were taken and who were then imprisoned, fending for themselves as Litigants in Person[vi]. Their petition Children Placed in Foster Care[vii] was put before the House of Commons on 3 September 2013 without any response so far.
  2. Foreigners among women[viii] whose children are targeted have also been observed by Vicky Haigh[ix]. She was imprisoned for 3 years for supposedly having breached a ‘non-molestation order’ – by saying ‘hello’ when she saw her daughter accidentally at a petrol station. She has not seen her now 10-year old daughter since, after she was given to her abusive father. She was the first victim named by John Hemming MP in Parliament: Gag removed job done[x]. Her ‘non-molestation order’ for no contact has just been renewed for 3 years.
  3. John Hemming is the only MP who reliably stands up for victims of family courts. He is Chairman of Justice for Families[xi] and has organised a meeting for foreign embassies that resulted in the Early Day Motion International Concerns about UK Law[xii].
  4. Christopher Booker’s column in The Telegraph addresses the issue regularly. He wrote 14 articles[xiii] about the Musas and 2 about Melissa Laird[xiv].
  5. The publisher of Forced Adoption as a book and website is Ian Josephs who has a law degree from Oxford and runs a language school in Monaco. He advises up to 10 parents a day by phone and has spent over £30,000 to help families.
  6. Abolish Adoption without Parental Consent[xv] is an online petition before the EU Parliament which is supported by a 12-page Dossier of Online Evidence[xvi].

[i]               http://gloriamusa.wordpress.com/about/
[ii]               http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/the-secrecy-of-the-family-courts-should-be-lifted-now.html
[iii]              http://punishmentwithoutcrime.wordpress.com/about/this-is-the-situation/whats-unique-in-the-uk/
[iv]              http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10191983/Our-child-protection-system-is-an-international-scandal.html
[v]               http://mckenzie-friends.co.uk/about/
[vi]              http://bit.ly/1bX2Qub
[vii]             http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhttp://punishmentwithoutcrime.wordpress.com/about/this-is-the-situation/whats-unique-in-the-uk/hansrd/cm130903/petnindx/130903-x.htm
[viii]             http://bit.ly/1027te2
[ix]              http://bit.ly/V7c28P
[x]               http://johnhemming.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/gag-removed-job-done.html
[xi]              http://justice-for-families.org.uk/
[xii]             http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2013-14/345
[xiii]             http://gloriamusa.wordpress.com/public-support/booker-articles/
[xiv]             http://melissalaird.wordpress.com/2013/09/14/deported-imprisoned-and-beaten-for-being-a-parent/
[xv]             http://www.change.org/petitions/eu-parliament-abolish-adoptions-without-parental-consent
[xvi]             https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NCF_XdMTNhnf947eniZ3SocOWyJ5CI6pramw4iOPY9c/edit?usp=sharing

Enhanced by Zemanta

CHALLENGES for McKenzie Friends – as Legal Aid is cut and white collar crimes rise

Lawyer

Help4LiPs are invited to discuss Litigants in Person and the challenges for McKenzie Friends with those who could make a difference. Hence we put these recommendations together:

  1. The need for acting as McKenzie Friend arose for many individuals out of very different circumstances, but generally:
    1. Being or having been victim of white collar crimes[1] themselves;
    2. Acting on behalf of victims who suffered from solicitors and / or barristers, on top of whatever damage or crime they had suffered.
    • Corruption in the legal profession and the courts is a real problem.
  2. In our observation, assisting Litigants in Person became necessary for the following reasons:
    1. Ministers and MPs didn’t do anything about fraudulent bankruptcies and home repossessions;
    2. It was impossible to find family lawyers who were acting in the interest of parents whose children were taken into care or forcibly adopted by Social Services;
    3. Prison conditions of Litigants in Person in general and parents of child snatching[2] in particular were so appalling that more help became necessary.
    • Family courts, their secrecy[3] and their supposed legitimacy are an international scandal, as Christopher Booker writes regularly in The Telegraph and as formulated in Early Day Motion 345[4] by John Hemming MP.
    • “There is no accountability”, says John Hemming MP.
  3. As Voluntary Public Interest Advocates, we don’t charge for what we do.

OPEN LETTER to Haringey Council by McKenzie Friend re consular access to children

Originally posted on A Nigerian Family - Destroyed by Haringey Council - Gagged from Reporting:

Paul Randle-Jolliffehas been involved as a McKenzie Friend (lay legal advisor) with the Musa case long before I tried to help.

Here he writes to Haringey’s Children’s Care Services reminding them of the many times they ignored or transgressed the law, especially their Social Workers and Police Officers. He also criticises judges but according to John Hemming MP, the only MP who consistently stands up for this cause, Parliament is the only authority for them, but it doesn’t exercise this privilege.

The trigger was Sir James Munby’s judgement regarding a Slovak boy that resulted in the Daily Mail reporting: UK Courts must not decide fate of foreign children.

He mentions the pilot Maurice J Kirk BVSc whose arrest is held against him for not attending court! That is in Cardiff where he is wrongfully imprisoned; but Wales seems to be particularly bad.

But, actually, every case seems to…

View original 129 more words