Category Archives: Social Services

REPORTING PAEDOPHILIA to the Home Office whilst #childsnatchuk leads to #paedobritain

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the Nation...

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the National Revival of Poland (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Dear Home Secretary

OPEN LETTER

This is to draw your attention to related aspects that we have experienced as the Association of McKenzie Friends, set up to practise voluntary public interest advocacy.

Besides the initiators of the National Inquiry into organised Child Sexual Abuse, I Cc the members of the Home Affairs Committee, trusting that they will take an interest.

As it is our duty to report a crime and NOT reporting paedophilia is going to be a criminal offence, we would appreciate answers to the following questions:

  1. Who will protect a Lithuanian boy in UK care from his paedophile father?
    • His mother and grandmother fled the father’s persecutions in Lithuania, but he was forcibly removed by Brent Police on 23 September 2013;
    • Social Services failed to investigate the father’s medical and criminal records;
    • HHJ Million gave residence of the boy to the father, contrary to a judgement of the Lithuanian Supreme Court. His judgement twists reality and evidence in a way that turns black into white and white into black. Unfortunately, the mother has reached a state of mind that makes her incapable of presenting the case, let alone appeal it appropriately.
    • When refusing permission to appeal Justice McFarlane said “This is not the end of the road for the boy.” But who will make sure that he WON’T be handed over by Brent Social Services???
    • We alerted Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe with this email and published our witness statement in this blog post.
  2. Similarly, who will undo the damage done to these five Portuguese children?
    • After an accusation by the oldest son which he retracted, the father was arrested and all children were removed on 23 April 2013 by 2 Social Workers and Lincolnshire Police – under Emergency Police Protection Orders.
    • The oldest son wrote desperate letters to the judge fearing ‘bum rape’ by the Social Worker, but HHJ Simler wouldn’t admit a question in court relating to this violation of the UN Convention of Child Rights which the UK has ratified.
    • In the secrecy of family courts, she decided that all children need to be put into permanent care and the two youngest ones ought to be adopted.
    • The parents’ desperate attempts to get their children back eventually led to negotiations with Portuguese authorities on 17 April 2014. But they have not been handed over to a Portuguese institution, as agreed. Instead, the siblings have been separated and two of them are supposed to be adopted. Lincolnshire Council have still not sent copies of the Minutes of the meeting either. Furthermore, the parents are treated as criminals for their contact sessions every two months.
  3. Who cares about this American boy who has not seen his mother since 12 December 2011, when he was 4 and snatched by Barnet Council?
  • Having assisted American mother Melissa Laird whilst in HMP Holloway, we tried to ensure that she gets the oral hearing that had been scheduled to take place on 05 December 2013.
  • However, as John Hemming MP announced: she was deported whilst her child was kept for adoption.
  • Her attempts to get a Skype connection or videolink failed due to the ancient technology used here compared with what is available in the US.
  • This is clearly not only a violation of UK laws but also Convention laws ensuring a fair trial.
  • To top the miscarriage of justice turning into perversion, we, as pro bono McKenzie Friends, have been ordered costs by the Treasury Solicitor’s Office and have to become litigants ourselves!

Continue reading

OPEN LETTER to the Met regarding internationally protective paedophiles – at the cost of a Lithuanian boy

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the Nation...

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the National Revival of Poland (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Dear Sir Bernard

As the Association of McKenzie Friends we are ‘public interest advocates’ and follow white collar crimes associated with organised child sexual abuse and child snatching closely, as we are getting more and more requests for help.

Hence we alerted you about a crime in HMP Holloway which resulted in a US mother being deported whilst her child was kept for adoption.

This is to report a crime against a Lithuanian boy who was forcefully removed from his mother and grandmother, after they escaped his father’s persecutions in Lithuania – despite a judgement in the mother’s favour of the Supreme Court. Fortunately, the mother recorded the removal on video.

Unfortunately, however, Brent Social Services and HHJ Million operate in the father’s interests rather than those of the boy who needs to be protected from his ‘red banana’, as he calls it which we attach and publish on www.audrone.wordpress.com. Continue reading

DO YOU WANT to stop child snatching and paedophile scandals? Everybody knows!

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the Nation...

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the National Revival of Poland (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Do you want to stop child snatching and paedophile scandals? This is the subject line of an email I sent to all MPs who have not yet expressed their support for the call to a National Enquiry into organised child sexual abuse.

The remarkable Tap publishes It’s not just Parliament that’s run and controlled by a paedophile ring. One of the items says: It’s gone international:

You are welcome to refer to this email, if you use www.WriteToThem.com to contact your own MP:

This is to ask when you will add your support to those 141 MPs so far who demand a National Enquiry into organised child sexual abuse.

Continue reading

WILL LITHUANIA FOLLOW the precedence set by Slovakia, Portugal and Latvia?

This Lithuanian article For drunken past – a terrible punishment for the mother – triggered this blog post:

The Slovakian Government succeeded in getting the two Boor boys returned after demos outside the UK Embassy and significant TV coverage.

A year later, the Slovak TV station produced this subtitled programme, when it learned that the precedence set by Slovakia had not made a difference in the UK:

Continue reading

COURT HEARINGS in December illustrate how the UK’s ‘child protection’ system is an international scandal

13 07 14 Justice BWNEWS RELEASE                                                    19 November 2013

‘BACK for CHRISTMAS’ for STOLEN UK & FOREIGN CHILDREN

3 Court Hearings in December illustrate how the UK’s ‘child protection’ system is an international scandal

US mother Melissa Laird[i] is listed for a hearing on 5 December 2013 in the High Court to address the ‘substance of her case’ and to ‘exercise her rights of appeal’. Due to torturous prison conditions in HMP Holloway including being beaten up[ii], she was seriously prevented from advancing her legal affairs. This included contact with her son from whom she was separated in December 2011, when he was 4 years-old. She was advised to plead ‘guilty’ to ‘abduction of a child’, her own, after having relocated from the UK to Spain; in May 2011 Barnet Council had issued a European Arrest Warrant. She was arrested when she took her son to hospital in Alicante in December. In March 2012, Family Judge Mayer ordered that contact was at the discretion of Barnet Council who deemed it best not to arrange for any contact at all, contrary to the Children’s Act 1989 and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Nigerian couple Gloria and Chiwar Musa[iii] were also imprisoned after their children had been forcefully removed by 8 Police Officers of Haringey Council. The goal is the same: keep the children for foster ‘care’, dispensing with the consent of the parents for forced adoption[iv] or punishment without crime[v] and finally deport the parents. Their appeal hearing is listed on 6 December 2013.  Continue reading

THE SOVEREIGN asks the Prime Minister to consider the points we raise

13 09 13 PalaceThe Palace is always reliable: you get a response and your letter gets passed on. The question is whether the Ministers responsible end up thinking and writing. Mr Cameron passed our letter on to Edward Timpson MP who wrote this response. Let’s see whether we’ll get another letter.

In my experience, it’s all a firewall designed to fob off. Let them do whatever they are doing – who cares about the consequences or the damages inflicted.

However, lobbying consists in ‘converting’ others. Given the web now, we can help by sending relevant links. The ‘conversion game’ is different on the web with its memory and the mainstream press that becomes fish wrapping paper the next day… Continue reading

TO EDWARD TIMPSON MP: Return our Stolen Children – our letter to the Prime Minister

Authors considering attachment in non-western ...

Authors considering attachment in non-western cultures have noted the connection of attachment theory with Western family and child care patterns characteristic of Bowlby’s time. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Dear Minister

Re 2013/0049277ETPO

Your response to our letter to the Prime Minister is helpful in the sense that we are encouraging parents to quote it and hold Social Services and Judges to the law that you refer to. For in our observation the public authorities are far from complying with the Rule of Law! Hence I published it on our site.

However, your letter is distinctly not helpful for

  • The 50 children who die in ‘care’, as you have admitted in Parliament
    • Do the perpetrators ever get prosecuted?
  • The 10,000 children who go missing from ‘care’, as your Parliamentary Groups published;
    • Who compensates them and their families?
  • The uncounted children who get abused in ‘care’ as published in What our judges forget when they send children into care.
    • Do you want to wait until they find their biological parents and haunt you via Facebook?

And your letter is certainly not helpful for all those parents who lost their children and therefore sign petitions, participated in the demonstration outside Downing Street, join Facebook groups, publish videos and websites and generally expose what Christopher Booker has referred to repeatedly as an international scandal. This is best demonstrated by EDM 345: International Concerns about UK Law. Continue reading