McKENZIE FRIENDS under the looking glass: a report from the Legal Consumer Services Panel

14 04 18 Fee charging McKenzie FriendsThis report covers four types of McKenzie Friends:

  • one off helpers
  • occasional and regular volunteers
  • fee-charging ‘amateurs’
  • fee-charging ‘professionals’

Struck off lawyers may also turn into McKenzie Friends.

The report aims at balancing between ‘access to justice‘ and ‘consumer protection‘ and makes 15 recommendations:

Recommendation 1: Fee-charging McKenzie Friends should be recognised as a legitimate feature of the evolving legal services market.

Attitudes of judges and lawyers

Recommendation 2: The training courses on litigants in person which the Judicial College has been asked to consider should include content on McKenzie Friends.

Recommendation 3: Guidance notes issued by professional bodies on litigants in person should include content on McKenzie Friends.

Recommendation 4: The Practice Guidance should be reviewed and amended to portray McKenzie Friends in a more positive way.

Public awareness

Recommendation 5: Education and advice directed towards litigants in person should set out the benefits of using a McKenzie Friend as one form of support available to them.

Recommendation 6: A white label consumer guide on McKenzie Friends should be produced, with the assistance of Law for Life, for use by the advice sector.

Recommendation 7: More details of judgements, which highlight where the rights of McKenzie Friends who have behaved improperly have been restricted by the use of Civil Restraint Orders, should be routinely published on www.Gov.uk.

Litigation: a grey area?

Recommendation 8: The Legal Services Board should review case law on the definition of the conduct of litigation and publish a document which seeks to clarify its meaning. Depending on the findings of this research, the Board should consider recommending to the Law Commission that the law in this area be reviewed.

Recommendation 9: The Legal Services Board should consider the findings of this report as part of its ongoing work on simplifying legal services regulation.

Rights of audience

Recommendation 10: An automatic right of audience should not be granted to McKenzie Friends.

Recommendation 11: The Practice Guidance should be updated to take account of recent case law. In an ideal world, the Panel would like judges to have a wide discretion to grant a right of audience when this would be in the interests of justice.

Recommendation 12: There should be consistent use of CVs, notices or other simple tools that can help assess the credentials of McKenzie Friends when considering applications for a right of audience to be granted.

Recommendation 13: External regulation of McKenzie Friends should not be introduced.

Self-regulation

Recommendation 14: Fee-charging McKenzie Friends should form a recognised trade association.

Recommendation 15: The Civil Justice Council’s draft code of practice should be updated to include measures targeted at the unfair commercial practices described in this report.
Our preferred approach

All in all, the panel that put the report together has clearly no experience with

But it does recognise

Fee-charging McKenzie Friends is just one example of the flaws in the current system becoming exposed in harsher focus, as the market adapts to the legal aid and competition reforms … in order to further the interests of consumers.

In may naive assumption I imagine consumers to expect:

  • fair trials and compensation, i.e. access to justice and compliance with the law;
  • public authorities to deliver public services, i.e. paid for by the tax payer, not from ‘cost orders’;
  • public servants to operate in the public interest, i.e. applying to common sense, decency, fairness and justice…
Enhanced by Zemanta
Advertisements

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician, software designer, system analyst, event organiser, independent web publisher and online promoter of positivity.
This entry was posted in Acting as McKenzie Friend, Early Day Motions, EU Parliament, General, Judicial Review, Prison Visits, Public Interest Advocacy, Right of Audience, Stolen Children of the UK and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to McKENZIE FRIENDS under the looking glass: a report from the Legal Consumer Services Panel

  1. Pingback: GUIDANCE NOTES for writing Position Statements as a way of ‘Taking Stock’ | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

  2. Pingback: McKENZIE FRIENDS challenged or the Forensics of a Legal Farce | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

  3. Pingback: BRACING for BATTLE in Court 2: McKenzie Friends helped by Star McKenzie Terence Ewing | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

  4. Pingback: WHO PROTECTS this boy from his father’s red banana? WITNESS STATEMENTS and Chronology of Events by MzKenzie Friends | Lithuanian Audrone I trying to protect her son

  5. Pingback: OPEN LETTER to the Met regarding internationally protective paedophiles – at the cost of a Lithuanian boy | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

  6. Pingback: Tuesday 19/08/14 next hearing in the Inner London Crown Court – with or without legal representation? | National Inquiry into Organised Child Sexual Abuse

  7. Pingback: TARGETING McKenzie Friends – with money as their ‘tool to kill’ | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

  8. Undeniably imagine that that you said. Your favorite reasonn appeared to be at the wweb the simplest thing to be mindful of.
    I say to you, I certainly get irked even as other folks think
    about worries that they just don’t know about.
    You controlled to hit the nail upon the hihest and also outlined
    out the entire thing without having side effect , other folks can take a
    signal. Will probably be back to get more.
    Thanks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s