The development of Petitioning EU Parliament since 2013 made me write this email to the clerk of Mrs Justice Pauffley, the High Court judge who had ordered me to appear before her after a private meeting with Barnet Council – behind the back of the mother of the two whistleblower kids. Please sign the Petition! It’s THE chance – not only for children in the UK!
Dear Mr Clark
Mrs Justice Pauffley had asked me not to write to her. This therefore comes to you to illustrate the level of debate that has emerged from submissions to the Petitions Committee of the EU Parliament. Ours is only one of 21 from the UK and covers:
- Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent with
- Systemic Patterns of Child Snatching and Forced Adoptions in the UK.
Due to the list of potential CRIMINAL charges emanating from the Gareev-Dearman children’s allegations we added:
- Using the Secrecy of UK Family Courts to Cover-Up Criminal Activities is as much on file as and
- Discrepancies between EU Directive 2011/92 and UK Family Courts Law.
I have suffered serious stress, inconvenience and hardship, having to live in exile due to Barnet Council’s threat of prosecution in their Position Statement and Mrs Justice Pauffley’s Penal Notice with threat of imprisonment of 10 February 2015. Would you please confirm that she always signs her Orders without wet ink and as JJ? I shall launch my book Forced Adoptions – The European Dimension in Brussels and I can assure you that the ‘evil and / or foolish’ internet community won’t go away either. Should Mrs Justice Pauffley hand custody to their father who had Non-Molestation Orders against him, she has to face that mistakes, short-comings and even lies of her judgement will get exposed yet more. It has been suggested that the children are only alive thanks to the internet publicity. The Round Table at the Slovak Embassy was a change from denial to admission that there is a problem with UK Family Courts. John Hemming MP rebuts the ‘expert’ report about Adoption without Consent with an email about what is Unlawful abroad, but Normal in English law: relying on opinions of local authorities to remove a child is unlawful, citing Lashin v Russia. It is alleged that some or all of the 18 ‘special’ children were adopted for the purpose of being abused. Following her judgement, this is therefore to recommend that Mrs Justice Pauffley hands custody over the children to their Russian grandparents – the extended family and kinship consideration that has always been claimed by Ministers to be priority for Social Services and Courts. In the spirit of Publicity is the Very Soul of Justice, it should also be easy for Mrs Justice Pauffley to set the Penal Notice against the mother and myself aside, given that the course of events has long superseded its substance. With many thanks for your attention, Yours sincerely, Sabine K McNeill _______________________ Skype: sabine.kurjo.mcneill Web publisher Association of McKenzie Friends … petitioning EU Parliament
Belinda’s take: Save the Hampstead Children (18): Dear Mr Clark